Mini Ramblings #3 – Crash Bandicoot: The Huge Adventure

  • Genre: Platformer
  • Platform: GBA

Sometimes I just don’t know what I want to play, so I let a little backlog chooser I wrote pick for me. This is one of those times. I’ve got a bit of a love/hate relationship with the Crash series. I generally like the gameplay, but the PS1 games in particular always felt unnecessarily punishing to me. Crash 4 really felt like a change for me in terms of avoiding that punishment factor, though I hadn’t played the older post-Naughty Dog entries. As it turns out, some of the things I liked about Crash 4 and its small iterations to reduce punishment had already been started in this game.

It didn’t really dawn on me how much I was not getting angry at the game until I realized I had nearly completed it, and there’s a few things that really fed into that compared to the 2D sections of the PS1 game. The jumps are a little more forgiving, so you aren’t falling into gaps. Fruit and extra lives are a little more common, so you aren’t constantly fighting progression loss from game overs. Aku Aku is a little bit more present, so you’ve got a higher likelihood of second chances if you miss knocking out an enemy.

Like I said in the Crash 4 ramblings, it all leads to reduced user friction. It’s not that this game is mechanically that different. It’s bouncing off crates and sliding under low ceilings and spin jumping to take out enemies; there was plenty of that on the PS1 games. It’s not even necessarily that much easier in that I was still dying a lot. What it is is challenging in a way that lets the player get through based on their skill without progression loss, rather than the challenge being around trying not to get a game over. It lets the player be risky and working at a fast pace, rather than slowing to a crawl just to stay alive. It’s ultimately just a lot more fun.

The rest of this is pretty standard fare as far as Crash games go, so there’s not much else to add. It was nice just kind of falling into a game without expectations and enjoying it so much. It was even more nice seeing that the lessons from Crash 4 weren’t something that happened after years of down time, but were instead something that was starting to happen years ago. Given the platform this was on, it makes sense that the series would try to be a little more forgiving, but it worked out in a way that really made the game more fun, and that’s something that will always work out.

Game Ramblings #121 – Crash Bandicoot 4: It’s About Time

More Info from Activision

  • Genre: Platformer
  • Platform: PS4
  • Also Available On: Xbox One

I mucked around in the N-Sane Trilogy recently, and frankly it hadn’t aged well. The Crash series has always been on the far harder end in terms of difficulty, but that wasn’t really the issue I had going back to those games. There was just a lot of little things that caused a great deal of friction to the user in ways that no longer really fit in modern games. Crash 4 in that sense is a top example of a few little things going a long way. This game really isn’t that different from the original trilogy, but it’s such a drastically better experience anway.

If you haven’t played a Crash game before, there’s not that much to really explain. It’s a pretty standard platformer, but because it came out before the PlayStation had analog sticks, there’s a whole lot of side scrolling or running into/out of the screen, rather than an openness more typical of 3D platformers.. Where the Crash series really stood out was more in visuals and characters, and not so much in gameplay. Crash 4 is still basically that, but adds in a bit more of a loose sense of 3D space, as well as some masks that mess with the mechanics a bit. These aren’t usually big changes – a bit of gravity manipulation, maybe some time dilation – but they mix up the gameplay in fun ways.

Where this game also really hasn’t changed is that it’s still really fucking difficult. Some of that comes down to the camera – for example depth is often very not obvious and it feels like this is done on purpose. Some of that is in view restriction – for example traps like to be just off screen for you to fall into. Some of that is down to the timing window being really tight – for example if you don’t get on a wall run at the right height and don’t jump off just when you get the right sound effects you’ll fall to your death. Some of that is just physics being wonky – I died a number of times just to the jumps not really performing in a consistent manner, particularly on moving platforms. None of this is really new to the series. In the past this would be infuriating, and result in me shelving the games. However, this is where Crash 4 really shines.

That user friction from the original trilogy? It all came down to the lives mechanic. You had a small amount of lives, and when you ran out, it was game over. You lose progress in the level and have to start it over again. In a lot of cases, a game over would be followed by a game over where you didn’t even get back to the original point you were at. It was frankly a tired mechanic 25 years ago, and it’s even worse now.

Luckily, the real big change for this game was getting rid of lives. Ya, there’s technically a mode you can play where it uses the original lives system, but frankly I don’t see a reason to play it. However, they handle removal of lives in a way that works for all levels of users. Want to be that hardcore 100% run player that wants to finish levels without dying? Well, there’s rewards for that. But if not, you can die away and get through the level a checkpoint at a time until you reach the end. The challenge is now in simply iteratively progressing to the end of the level, not in being super careful to avoid losing lives. It reduces overall user friction and in many cases simply serves to improve the overall gameplay pace.

Speaking of checkpoints, those have seen some nice touches. Since lives are now removed, you can be dying a whole bunch of times and not making forward progress. The checkpoints that were there in the past are still there, and even more important now that you can die a lot. However, in a lot of cases you may get stuck in one area where maybe you have a long stretch between checkpoints or a specific obstacle blocking you. Part of the improvements here is that after a few deaths in a segment, you gain an Aku Aku at spawn. If you die a few more times, but have progressed far enough between checkpoints, you may gain a new dynamic checkpoint that replaces a crate. Again, it’s an improvement to reduce friction and allow you to perhaps take things a little less carefully, improving the overall pace.

The checkpoint work also extends to boss fights. In general I found these to be surprisingly easy in relation to the normal levels. That said, the checkpoints in place were well appreciated. The way those work in bosses is to put a hard checkpoint after each damage event, which typically would come as a result of some stretch of obstacle avoidance gameplay. It meant that seeing and losing out to a new mechanic in a new phase of the fight wasn’t a huge loss in time; it was just a reset to the beginning of the phase, and a chance to use what you learned to get through it. Again, another case of reducing friction.

Ultimately it’s that reduction in user friction that makes this one feel like a modern videogame. They didn’t have to fundamentally change the gameplay to be like Mario or Ratchet or A Hat in Time. They didn’t have to artifically make the game easier and leave their nostalgia blast behind. They didn’t have to change genres to appeal to a modern audience. They simply had to take friction points and get rid of them. I know that sounds easy to say, and I guess to some extent it is, but it’s not a choice without some level of care behind it. The points of friction that got removed are all things that have a very specific purpose – they allow people who are masters at the game to still earn rewards and have a sense of accomplishment for completing levels in a “perfect” manner, but allow the game to gracefully adapt to skill levels down the chain. It’s a shedding of tired things like lives and regression in progress in order to favor a less careful and higher pace of gameplay. It’s keeping simply what worked the best, and getting rid of things that worked the worst. In doing these things, what pops out is a game that is simultaneously retro and modern, and much better than the core trilogy that precedes it, despite largely being the same.